netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix "don't use PHY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Dec 2021 14:22:56 +0100
From:   Maarten Zanders <maarten.zanders@...d.be>
To:     "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix "don't use PHY_DETECT on
 internal PHY's"

On 12/7/21 11:32, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> Maarten Zanders has confirmed that the issue he was addressing was for
> an 88E6250 switch, which does not have a PHY_DETECT bit in bit 12, but
> instead a link status bit. Therefore, mv88e6xxx_port_ppu_updates() does
> not report correctly.
...>    Yes, you're right, I'm targeting the 6250 family. And yes, your
>    suggestion would solve my case and is a better implementation for
>    the other devices (as far as I can see).

I confirm that this patch works on my hardware, which uses an 88E6071 
(88E6250 family).