netdev - Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 0/4] Add support to multiple RDMA priorities for FDB rules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Dec 2021 14:58:49 -0400
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
Cc:     Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 0/4] Add support to multiple RDMA priorities
 for FDB rules

On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 11:36:17AM -0800, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
> 
> Currently, the driver ignores the user's priority for flow steering
> rules in FDB namespace. Change it and create the rule in the right
> priority.
> 
> It will allow to create FDB steering rules in up to 16 different
> priorities.
> 
> Maor Gottlieb (4):
>   net/mlx5: Separate FDB namespace
>   net/mlx5: Refactor mlx5_get_flow_namespace
>   net/mlx5: Create more priorities for FDB bypass namespace
>   RDMA/mlx5: Add support to multiple priorities for FDB rules
> 
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/fs.c               | 18 ++---
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h          |  3 +-
>  .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_cmd.c  |  4 +-
>  .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c | 76 +++++++++++++++----
>  include/linux/mlx5/fs.h                       |  1 +
>  5 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

Did you want this to go to the rdma tree? If so it seems fine, please
update the shared branch

Thanks,
Jason