lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 03:50:36 +0000 From: "Zhou, Jie2X" <jie2x.zhou@...el.com> To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, "lizhijian@...itsu.com" <lizhijian@...itsu.com> CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Li, Philip" <philip.li@...el.com>, lkp <lkp@...el.com>, "Ma, XinjianX" <xinjianx.ma@...el.com>, "Li, ZhijianX" <zhijianx.li@...el.com> Subject: Re: selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh: ipv6_ping test failed hi, man ip, the output about exit value is like following. "Exit status is 0 if command was successful, and 1 if there is a syntax error. If an error was reported by the kernel exit status is 2." Did the following COMMAND have syntax error? If not, should I still change the expected rc from 2 to 1? ####################################################### HINT: Fails since VRF device does not support linklocal or multicast COMMAND: ip netns exec ns-A /bin/ping6 -c1 -w1 fe80::7c4c:bcff:fe66:a63a%red ping: sendmsg: Network is unreachable PING fe80::7c4c:bcff:fe66:a63a%red(fe80::7c4c:bcff:fe66:a63a%red) 56 data bytes --- fe80::7c4c:bcff:fe66:a63a%red ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms TEST: ping out, VRF bind - ns-B IPv6 LLA [FAIL] ####################################################### HINT: Fails since VRF device does not support linklocal or multicast COMMAND: ip netns exec ns-A /bin/ping6 -c1 -w1 ff02::1%red ping: sendmsg: Network is unreachable PING ff02::1%red(ff02::1%red) 56 data bytes --- ff02::1%red ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms TEST: ping out, VRF bind - multicast IP [FAIL] ####################################################### best regards, ________________________________________ From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 11:20 AM To: Jakub Kicinski; lizhijian@...itsu.com Cc: Zhou, Jie2X; davem@...emloft.net; shuah@...nel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Li, Philip; lkp; Ma, XinjianX; Li, ZhijianX Subject: Re: selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh: ipv6_ping test failed On 12/7/21 8:58 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > Adding David and Zhijian. > > On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 07:07:40 +0000 Zhou, Jie2X wrote: >> hi, >> >> I test ipv6_ping by "./fcnal-test.sh -v -t ipv6_ping". >> There are two tests failed. >> >> TEST: ping out, VRF bind - ns-B IPv6 LLA [FAIL] >> TEST: ping out, VRF bind - multicast IP [FAIL] >> >> While in fcnal-test.sh the expected command result is 2, the result is 1, so the test failed. >> ipv6_ping_vrf() >> { >> ...... >> for a in ${NSB_LINKIP6}%${VRF} ${MCAST}%${VRF} >> do >> log_start >> show_hint "Fails since VRF device does not support linklocal or multicast" >> run_cmd ${ping6} -c1 -w1 ${a} >> log_test_addr ${a} $? 2 "ping out, VRF bind" >> done >> >> The ipv6_ping test output is attached. >> Did I set something wrong result that these tests failed? >> >> best regards, ping6 is failing as it should. Can you send a patch to change the expected rc from 2 to 1?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists