lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM4PR11MB5390BA1C370A5AF90E666F1EFB709@DM4PR11MB5390.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Dec 2021 10:22:16 +0000
From:   <Thomas.Kopp@...rochip.com>
To:     <pavel.modilaynen@...vocars.com>, <mkl@...gutronix.de>
CC:     <drew@...gleboard.org>, <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
        <menschel.p@...teo.de>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <will@...china.cc>
Subject: RE: [net-next 6/6] can: mcp251xfd: mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_read(): work
 around broken CRC on TBC register

Hi Pavel,
 
> We have the similar CRC read errors but
> the lowest byte is not 0x00 and 0x80, it's actually 0x0x or 0x8x, e.g.
> 
> mcp251xfd spi0.0 can0: CRC read error at address 0x0010 (length=4,
> data=82 d1 fa 6c, CRC=0xd9c2) retrying.
> 
> 0xb0 0x10 0x04 0x82 0xd1 0xfa 0x6c => 0x59FD (not matching)
> 
> but if I flip the first received bit  (highest bit in the lowest byte):
> 0xb0 0x10 0x04 0x02 0xd1 0xfa 0x6c => 0xD9C2 (matching!)

What settings do you have on your setup? Can you please print the dmesg output from the init? I'm especially interested in Sysclk and SPI speed.

Thanks,
Thomas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ