[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wnkdwyov.fsf@toke.dk>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2021 17:05:52 +0100
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH bpf-next 5/8] xdp: add xdp_do_redirect_frame() for
pre-computed xdp_frames
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com> writes:
> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Add an xdp_do_redirect_frame() variant which supports pre-computed
>> xdp_frame structures. This will be used in bpf_prog_run() to avoid having
>> to write to the xdp_frame structure when the XDP program doesn't modify the
>> frame boundaries.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/filter.h | 4 ++++
>> net/core/filter.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
>> index b6a216eb217a..845452c83e0f 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/filter.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/filter.h
>> @@ -1022,6 +1022,10 @@ int xdp_do_generic_redirect(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
>> int xdp_do_redirect(struct net_device *dev,
>> struct xdp_buff *xdp,
>> struct bpf_prog *prog);
>> +int xdp_do_redirect_frame(struct net_device *dev,
>> + struct xdp_buff *xdp,
>> + struct xdp_frame *xdpf,
>> + struct bpf_prog *prog);
>
> I don't really like that we are passing both the xdp_buff ptr and
> xdp_frame *xdpf around when one is always null it looks like?
Yeah, the problem is basically that AF_XDP uses xdp_buff all the way
through, so we can't pass xdp_frame to that. I do agree that it's a bit
ugly, though; maybe we can just do the XSK disambiguation in the caller;
will take another look at this - thanks!
-Toke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists