netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: prefer 1000baseT over 1000baseKX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <163908001141.24516.17236728183167042807.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 09 Dec 2021 20:00:11 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: prefer 1000baseT over 1000baseKX

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:

On Wed, 08 Dec 2021 11:36:30 +0000 you wrote:
> The PHY settings table is supposed to be sorted by descending match
> priority - in other words, earlier entries are preferred over later
> entries.
> 
> The order of 1000baseKX/Full and 1000baseT/Full is such that we
> prefer 1000baseKX/Full over 1000baseT/Full, but 1000baseKX/Full is
> a lot rarer than 1000baseT/Full, and thus is much less likely to
> be preferred.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next] net: phy: prefer 1000baseT over 1000baseKX
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/f20f94f7f52c

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html