[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB2780874495EC43159600767BCA729@DM6PR11MB2780.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 13:59:29 +0000
From: "Ong, Boon Leong" <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>
To: Yannick Vignon <yannick.vignon@....nxp.com>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
"Jose Abreu" <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
"alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com" <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
"Kanzenbach, Kurt" <kurt.kanzenbach@...utronix.de>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: stmmac: fix tc flower deletion for VLAN
priority Rx steering
>I was about to post a very similar fix for that same problem (except I
>was adding support for other packet steering types)...
>I can confirm your patch works.
Thanks for testing it.
>Note that a simpler way to reproduce is
>simply to add a filter, then remove all the filters, e.g.:
>$ IFDEVNAME=eth0
>$ tc qdisc add dev $IFDEVNAME ingress
>$ tc qdisc add dev $IFDEVNAME root mqprio num_tc 8 \
> map 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \
> queues 1@0 1@1 1@2 1@3 1@4 1@5 1@6 1@7 hw 0
>$ tc filter add dev $IFDEVNAME parent ffff: protocol 802.1Q \
> flower vlan_prio 0 hw_tc 0
>$ tc filter del dev $IFDEVNAME ingress
Yes, you are right above. I will resend v2 for this patch
to fix the comment given by Sebastian on "net" patch version
here: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20211209130335.81114-1-boon.leong.ong@intel.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists