[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB2780AF6CA7085765EBA0C818CA729@DM6PR11MB2780.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 14:03:06 +0000
From: "Ong, Boon Leong" <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
"Kanzenbach, Kurt" <kurt.kanzenbach@...utronix.de>
CC: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
"alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com" <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: stmmac: add tc flower filter for
EtherType matching
>On 2021-12-10 11:10:04 [+0100], Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
>> > + if (match.mask->n_proto) {
>> > + __be16 etype = ntohs(match.key->n_proto);
>>
>> n_proto is be16. The ntohs() call will produce an u16.
>
>While at it, could we be please remove that __force in
>ETHER_TYPE_FULL_MASK and use cpu_to_be16() macro?
>
>> Thanks,
>> Kurt
>
>Sebastian
Thanks. Will do.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists