lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 11 Dec 2021 14:31:04 -0500
From:   Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To:     Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Oz Shlomo <ozsh@...dia.com>,
        Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>, Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>,
        Baowen Zheng <baowen.zheng@...igine.com>,
        Louis Peens <louis.peens@...igine.com>,
        oss-drivers@...igine.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 05/12] flow_offload: add ops to tc_action_ops
 for flow action setup

On 2021-12-09 04:27, Simon Horman wrote:
> From: Baowen Zheng <baowen.zheng@...igine.com>
> 
> Add a new ops to tc_action_ops for flow action setup.
> 
> Refactor function tc_setup_flow_action to use this new ops.
> 
> We make this change to facilitate to add standalone action module.
> 
> We will also use this ops to offload action independent of filter
> in following patch.


Please name these functions with "offload" instead of "flow".
It improves readability because those functions exist for the
purpose of offload.
So i would say:
s/XX_setup_flow_action/XX_setup_offload_action/g
i.e
flow_act_setup becomes offload_act_setup
and things like tcf_gate_flow_act_setup become
tcf_gate_offload_act_setup

Again from a naming convention that tc_setup_flow_action
should be tc_setup_offload_act() really..
Maybe an additional patch for that?

<Rant>
Really - this whole naming of things in flow_offload.{c,h}
is very misleading and simplistic. I know it is not your doing.
The term flow is very much related to exact matches. A better
name would have been "match" (then you dont care if it is
exact, prefix, range, ternary, etc). Note:
In this case you can offload actions independent of matches
so a binding to a match may not even exist.

cheers,
jamal

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ