lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 12 Dec 2021 20:19:26 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [net-next RFC PATCH v4 01/15] net: dsa: provide switch
 operations for tracking the master state

Hi Florian,

On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 08:22:39PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> If my kernel is built with no packet scheduler, is not the interface going
> to be configured with noop all of the time?

I made this test and it looks like interfaces that are down use noop,
normal multi-queue interfaces use mq, and stacked interfaces using LLTX
like DSA use noqueue when up:

root@...ian:~# zcat /proc/config.gz | grep NET_SCHED
# CONFIG_NET_SCHED is not set
root@...ian:~# ip a
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
    inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 ::1/128 scope host
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: bond0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 02:0b:67:72:9a:d5 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
3: sit0@...E: <NOARP> mtu 1480 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/sit 0.0.0.0 brd 0.0.0.0
4: eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1508 qdisc mq state UP group default qlen 1000
    link/ether de:79:92:89:2e:e6 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    altname enp0s0f2
    inet6 fe80::dc79:92ff:fe89:2ee6/64 scope link
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
5: swp0@...2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1504 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/ether a6:f4:af:fd:fc:73 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
6: swp1@...2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/ether a6:f4:af:fd:fc:73 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
7: swp2@...2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1504 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000
    link/ether a6:f4:af:fd:fc:73 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet6 fe80::a4f4:afff:fefd:fc73/64 scope link
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
8: sw0p0@...0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,M-DOWN> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/ether a6:f4:af:fd:fc:73 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
9: sw0p1@...0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,M-DOWN> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/ether a6:f4:af:fd:fc:73 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
10: sw0p2@...0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,M-DOWN> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/ether a6:f4:af:fd:fc:73 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
11: sw2p0@...2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000
    link/ether a6:f4:af:fd:fc:73 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet6 fe80::a4f4:afff:fefd:fc73/64 scope link
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
12: sw2p1@...2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/ether a6:f4:af:fd:fc:73 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
13: sw2p2@...2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/ether a6:f4:af:fd:fc:73 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
14: sw2p3@...2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/ether a6:f4:af:fd:fc:73 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff

Would this test be sufficient or do you have a specific concern?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ