netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] connector/cn_proc: Use task_is_in_init_pid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Dec 2021 16:58:32 +1100
From:   Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
To:     Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jan Harkes <jaharkes@...cmu.edu>, coda@...cmu.edu,
        Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
        Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, codalist@...a.cs.cmu.edu,
        linux-audit@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] connector/cn_proc: Use task_is_in_init_pid_ns()

On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 04:33:17PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> This patch replaces open code with task_is_in_init_pid_ns() to check if
> a task is in root PID namespace.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/connector/cn_proc.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c b/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
> index 646ad385e490..ccac1c453080 100644
> --- a/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
> +++ b/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
> @@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ static void cn_proc_mcast_ctl(struct cn_msg *msg,
>  	 * other namespaces.
>  	 */
>  	if ((current_user_ns() != &init_user_ns) ||
> -	    (task_active_pid_ns(current) != &init_pid_ns))
> +	    !task_is_in_init_pid_ns(current))
>  		return;
>

Sounds like there might scope for other wrappers - is_current_in_user_init_ns()

Acked-by: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>