netdev - Re: [net-next v3 2/2] net: sched: support hash/classid/cpuid selecting tx queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Dec 2021 09:41:33 +0800
From:   Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
To:     Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc:     Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Talal Ahmad <talalahmad@...gle.com>,
        Kevin Hao <haokexin@...il.com>,
        Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
        Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>,
        Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [net-next v3 2/2] net: sched: support hash/classid/cpuid
 selecting tx queue

On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 8:13 PM Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
>
> On 2021-12-13 17:53, Cong Wang wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 6:34 PM Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com> wrote:
>
> >> We support this in skbedit firstly in production. act_bpf can do more
> >> things than this. Anyway we
> >> can support this in both act_skbedit/acc_bpf. 1/2 is changed from
> >> skip_tx_queue in skb to per-cpu var suggested-by Eric. We need another
> >> patch which can change the
> >> per-cpu var in bpf. I will post this patch later.
> >
> > The point is if act_bpf can do it, you don't need to bother skbedit at
> > all.
>
> Just a comment on this general statement:
> I know of at least one large data centre that wont allow anything
> "compiled" to be installed unless it goes through a very long vetting
> process(we are talking months).
> "Compiled" includes bpf. This is common practise in a few other places
> some extreme more than others - the reasons are typically driven by
> either some overzelous program manager or security people. Regardless
> of the reasoning, this is a real issue.
Yes, I agree with you that
> Note: None of these data centres have a long process if what is
> installed is a bash script expressing policy.
> In such a case an upstream of a feature such as this is more useful.
>
>
> cheers,
> jamal
>


-- 
Best regards, Tonghao