lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 15 Dec 2021 22:27:46 +0000
From:   Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@...ek.ru>
To:     "Kubalewski, Arkadiusz" <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>,
        "Machnikowski, Maciej" <maciej.machnikowski@...el.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
        "richardcochran@...il.com" <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        "Byagowi, Ahmad" <abyagowi@...com>,
        "Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        "idosch@...sch.org" <idosch@...sch.org>,
        "mkubecek@...e.cz" <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
        "saeed@...nel.org" <saeed@...nel.org>,
        "michael.chan@...adcom.com" <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
        "petrm@...dia.com" <petrm@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 0/4] Add ethtool interface for RClocks

On 15.12.2021 12:14, Kubalewski, Arkadiusz wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Machnikowski, Maciej <maciej.machnikowski@...el.com>
>> Sent: poniedziaƂek, 13 grudnia 2021 09:54
>> To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
>> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org; Kubalewski, Arkadiusz <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>; richardcochran@...il.com; Byagowi, Ahmad <abyagowi@...com>; Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>; davem@...emloft.net; linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org; idosch@...sch.org; mkubecek@...e.cz; saeed@...nel.org; michael.chan@...adcom.com; petrm@...dia.com; Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@...ek.ru>
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 net-next 0/4] Add ethtool interface for RClocks
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
>>> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2021 5:17 PM
>>> To: Machnikowski, Maciej <maciej.machnikowski@...el.com>
>>> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org;
>>> Kubalewski, Arkadiusz <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>;
>>> richardcochran@...il.com; Byagowi, Ahmad <abyagowi@...com>; Nguyen,
>>> Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>; davem@...emloft.net; linux-
>>> kselftest@...r.kernel.org; idosch@...sch.org; mkubecek@...e.cz;
>>> saeed@...nel.org; michael.chan@...adcom.com; petrm@...dia.com; Vadim
>>> Fedorenko <vfedorenko@...ek.ru>
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 0/4] Add ethtool interface for RClocks
>>>
>>> On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 14:45:46 +0100 Maciej Machnikowski wrote:
>>>> Synchronous Ethernet networks use a physical layer clock to
>>>> syntonize the frequency across different network elements.
>>>>
>>>> Basic SyncE node defined in the ITU-T G.8264 consist of an Ethernet
>>>> Equipment Clock (EEC) and have the ability to synchronize to
>>>> reference frequency sources.
>>>>
>>>> This patch series is a prerequisite for EEC object and adds ability
>>>> to enable recovered clocks in the physical layer of the netdev object.
>>>> Recovered clocks can be used as one of the reference signal by the EEC.
>>>>
>>>> Further work is required to add the DPLL subsystem, link it to the
>>>> netdev object and create API to read the EEC DPLL state.
>>>
>>> You missed CCing Vadim. I guess Ccing the right people may be right up
>>> there with naming things as the hardest things in SW development..
>>>
>>> Anyway, Vadim - do you have an ETA on the first chunk of the PLL work?
>>
>> Sounds about right :) thanks for adding Vadim!
>>
> 
> Good day Vadim,
> 
> Can we help on the new PLL interfaces?
> I can start some works related to that, although would need a guidance
> from the expert.
> Where to place it?
> What in-kernel interfaces to use?
> Any other high level tips that could be useful?
> Or if you already started some work, could you please share some
> information?
> 
Hi!

I'm going to publish RFC till the end of the week and we will be able to
continue discussion via this mailing list. I think that netlink is a good
option for in-kernel interface and is easy to implement.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ