[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211215154403.40563759@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:44:03 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [pull-request] mlx5-next branch 2021-12-15
On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:35:09 -0800 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-12-15 at 14:58 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 22:14:11 +0000 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > > already posted before :
> > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20211201193621.9129-1-saeed@kernel.org/
> > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211208141722.13646-1-shayd@nvidia.com/
> >
> > Post them as a reply to the pull request like you usually do, please.
>
> They were already posted, and reviewed, and all maintainers were CC'ed,
> including you, why do you want me to spam the mailing list over and
> over again with the same patches ?
You reposting measly 5 patches is hardly spamming. I have scripts which
check if the contents of the PR match the posting, which obviously
can't follow random links from the email.
> This is not how genuine pull requests are supposed to work.
I'm not comfortable with blindly pulling patches from vendor trees.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists