lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:44:03 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
Cc:     Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [pull-request] mlx5-next branch 2021-12-15

On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:35:09 -0800 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-12-15 at 14:58 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 22:14:11 +0000 Saeed Mahameed wrote:  
> > > already posted before :
> > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20211201193621.9129-1-saeed@kernel.org/
> > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211208141722.13646-1-shayd@nvidia.com/  
> > 
> > Post them as a reply to the pull request like you usually do, please.  
> 
> They were already posted, and reviewed, and all maintainers were CC'ed,
> including you, why do you want me to spam the mailing list over and
> over again with the same patches ?

You reposting measly 5 patches is hardly spamming. I have scripts which
check if the contents of the PR match the posting, which obviously
can't follow random links from the email.

> This is not how genuine pull requests are supposed to work.

I'm not comfortable with blindly pulling patches from vendor trees.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ