[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211215092730.w4ptdsymqgdhtcte@skbuf>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 09:27:31 +0000
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
"linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"vivien.didelot@...il.com" <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 6/6] net: lan966x: Add switchdev support
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 03:31:29PM +0100, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> So long story short, I agree with your comments, I can make the
> notifier_block as singleton objects and start to use
> switchdev_handle_port_obj_add and the other variants.
> In this way it should also work "parallel instances of the driver".
To be clear, what I'd like to see for v5 is a set of patterns that is
simple, clean and functional enough that it could be copied by other
drivers - I'd be interested in limiting the VLANs on the CPU ports in
DSA too.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists