[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211216010932.GA2313631@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 09:09:32 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
codalist@...emann.coda.cs.cmu.edu,
Jan Harkes <jaharkes@...cmu.edu>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
coda@...cmu.edu, linux-audit@...hat.com,
coresight@...ts.linaro.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] audit: Use task_is_in_init_pid_ns()
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 02:09:12PM -0500, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 2021-12-14 17:35, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 3:33 AM Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Replace open code with task_is_in_init_pid_ns() for checking root PID
> > > namespace.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> > > ---
> > > kernel/audit.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > I'm not sure how necessary this is, but it looks correct to me.
>
> I had the same thought. I looks correct to me. I could see the value
> if it permitted init_pid_ns to not be global.
Just for a background info, we need to check root PID namespace in some
drivers [1], to avoid introducing more open codes, we decided to refactor
with helper task_is_in_init_pid_ns().
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211213121323.1887180-1-leo.yan@linaro.org/
> > Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Thanks for review, Paul and Richard.
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists