[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211216112433.GB4190@francesco-nb.int.toradex.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 12:24:33 +0100
From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>,
Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
Philippe Schenker <philippe.schenker@...adex.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: fec: reset phy on resume after power-up
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 11:24:24AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> I think you need to move the regulator into phylib, so the PHY driver
> can do the right thing. It is really the only entity which knows what
> is the correct thing to do.
Do you believe that the right place is the phylib and not the phy driver?
Is this generic enough?
Francesco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists