netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/10] Introduce unstable CT lookup helpers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEf4BzZzd7gzky1CJAFgG4m_VQ0nS05J_kSgEkcnBQiY0uuNOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Dec 2021 08:40:38 -0800
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To:     Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
Cc:     bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...dia.com>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/10] Introduce unstable CT lookup helpers

On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:36 AM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
<memxor@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 07:20:21AM IST, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
> > This series adds unstable conntrack lookup helpers using BPF kfunc support.  The
> > patch adding the lookup helper is based off of Maxim's recent patch to aid in
> > rebasing their series on top of this, all adjusted to work with module kfuncs [0].
> >
> >   [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211019144655.3483197-8-maximmi@nvidia.com
> >
> > To enable returning a reference to struct nf_conn, the verifier is extended to
> > support reference tracking for PTR_TO_BTF_ID, and kfunc is extended with support
> > for working as acquire/release functions, similar to existing BPF helpers. kfunc
> > returning pointer (limited to PTR_TO_BTF_ID in the kernel) can also return a
> > PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL now, typically needed when acquiring a resource can fail.
> > kfunc can also receive PTR_TO_CTX and PTR_TO_MEM (with some limitations) as
> > arguments now. There is also support for passing a mem, len pair as argument
> > to kfunc now. In such cases, passing pointer to unsized type (void) is also
> > permitted.
> >
> > Please see individual commits for details.
> >
> > Note: BPF CI needs to add the following to config to test the set. I did update
> > the selftests config in patch 8, but not sure if that is enough.
> >
> >       CONFIG_NETFILTER=y
> >       CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV4=y
> >       CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV6=y
> >       CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=y
> >
>
> Hm, so this is not showing up in BPF CI, is it some mistake from my side? The
> last couple of versions produced build time warnings in Patchwork, that I fixed,
> which I suspected was the main cause.

Not a mistake, for BPF CI there are separate configs that need to be
updated manually:
  - https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/.github/actions/vmtest/latest.config
for kernel patches CI
  - https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/tree/master/travis-ci/vmtest/configs
(there is x86-64 and s390x configs) for libbpf CI

>
> There's still one coming from the last patch, but based on [0], I am not sure
> whether I should be doing things any differently (and if I do fix it, it also
> needs to be done for the functions added before). The warnings are from the 11
> new kfuncs I added in net/bpf/test_run.c, for their missing declarations.
>
> Comments?
>
> [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200326235426.ei6ae2z5ek6uq3tt@ast-mbp
>
> > [...]
>
> --
> Kartikeya