netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 04/10] bpf: Introduce mem, size argument pair support for kfunc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 18 Dec 2021 18:19:22 -0800
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...dia.com>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 04/10] bpf: Introduce mem, size argument pair
 support for kfunc

On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 07:20:25AM +0530, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
> +static bool is_kfunc_arg_mem_size(const struct btf *btf,
> +				  const struct btf_param *arg,
> +				  const struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
> +{
> +	const struct btf_type *t;
> +	const char *param_name;
> +
> +	t = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, arg->type, NULL);
> +	if (!btf_type_is_scalar(t) || reg->type != SCALAR_VALUE)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/* In the future, this can be ported to use BTF tagging */
> +	param_name = btf_name_by_offset(btf, arg->name_off);
> +	if (strncmp(param_name, "len__", sizeof("len__") - 1))
> +		return false;

I like the feature and approach, but have a suggestion:
The "__sz" suffix would be shorter and more readable.
wdyt?