[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <PH0PR12MB548189EBA8346A960A0A409FDC7B9@PH0PR12MB5481.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 03:49:21 +0000
From: Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
CC: "stephen@...workplumber.org" <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [iproute2-next v2 4/4] vdpa: Enable user to set mtu of the vdpa
device
> From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2021 3:37 AM
>
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 01:53:01PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> > On 12/17/21 1:08 AM, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > > @@ -204,6 +217,8 @@ static void vdpa_opts_put(struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
> struct vdpa *vdpa)
> > > if (opts->present & VDPA_OPT_VDEV_MAC)
> > > mnl_attr_put(nlh, VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MACADDR,
> > > sizeof(opts->mac), opts->mac);
> > > + if (opts->present & VDPA_OPT_VDEV_MTU)
> > > + mnl_attr_put_u16(nlh, VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MTU,
> opts->mtu);
> >
> > Why limit the MTU to a u16? Eric for example is working on "Big TCP"
> > where IPv6 can work with Jumbograms where mtu can be > 64k.
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2675
>
> Well it's 16 bit at the virtio level, though we can extend that of course. Making
> it match for now removes need for validation.
> --
As Michael mentioned virtio specification limits the mtu to 64k-1. Hence 16-bit.
First we need to update the virtio spec to support > 64K mtu.
However, when/if (I don't know when) that happens, we need to make this also u32.
So may be we can make it u32 now, but still restrict the mtu value to 64k-1 in kernel, until the spec is updated.
Let me know, if you think that's future proofing is better, I first need to update the kernel to take nla u32.
> MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists