[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB27804CFB9A93A287DC4CB3A9CA7B9@DM6PR11MB2780.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 05:33:40 +0000
From: "Ong, Boon Leong" <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"Nambiar, Amritha" <amritha.nambiar@...el.com>
CC: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
"alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com" <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
"Kanzenbach, Kurt" <kurt.kanzenbach@...utronix.de>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: stmmac: add EthType Rx Frame steering
>On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 23:57:50 +0000 Nambiar, Amritha wrote:
>> ethtool did not support directing flows to a queue-group, but only a specific
>individual
>> queue
>
>Just to clarify - not sure how true that part is, ethtool rules can
>direct to RSS contexts since March 2018, your presentation is from 2020.
Just realized there is mistake in reply-to email list.
Now that the VLAN priority based RX steering patch is merged to net branch [1],
I would like to resume the discussion for this track.
Currently, we have vlan priority based RX steering be configured for stmmac
driver using tc flower way. Will community agree to the same tc flower
interface for EtherType based RX frame steering? If there is no further concern
on this, I will send v2 for the patch.
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20211211145134.630258-1-boon.leong.ong@intel.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists