[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <598860fe8307c120f07b4383b98cc51bde9cd531.1640029579.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 15:35:27 +0000
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: io-uring@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Subject: [RFC v2 05/19] net: don't track pfmemalloc for zc registered mem
In case of zerocopy frags are filled with userspace allocated memory, we
shouldn't care about setting skb->pfmemalloc for them, and especially
when the buffers were somehow pre-registered (i.e. getting bvec from
io_uring). Remove the tracking from __zerocopy_sg_from_bvec().
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
---
include/linux/skbuff.h | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
net/core/datagram.c | 7 +++++--
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
index f6a6fd67e1ea..eef064fbf715 100644
--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
@@ -2203,6 +2203,22 @@ static inline unsigned int skb_pagelen(const struct sk_buff *skb)
return skb_headlen(skb) + __skb_pagelen(skb);
}
+static inline void __skb_fill_page_desc_noacc(struct skb_shared_info *shinfo,
+ int i, struct page *page,
+ int off, int size)
+{
+ skb_frag_t *frag = &shinfo->frags[i];
+
+ /*
+ * Propagate page pfmemalloc to the skb if we can. The problem is
+ * that not all callers have unique ownership of the page but rely
+ * on page_is_pfmemalloc doing the right thing(tm).
+ */
+ frag->bv_page = page;
+ frag->bv_offset = off;
+ skb_frag_size_set(frag, size);
+}
+
/**
* __skb_fill_page_desc - initialise a paged fragment in an skb
* @skb: buffer containing fragment to be initialised
@@ -2219,17 +2235,7 @@ static inline unsigned int skb_pagelen(const struct sk_buff *skb)
static inline void __skb_fill_page_desc(struct sk_buff *skb, int i,
struct page *page, int off, int size)
{
- skb_frag_t *frag = &skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[i];
-
- /*
- * Propagate page pfmemalloc to the skb if we can. The problem is
- * that not all callers have unique ownership of the page but rely
- * on page_is_pfmemalloc doing the right thing(tm).
- */
- frag->bv_page = page;
- frag->bv_offset = off;
- skb_frag_size_set(frag, size);
-
+ __skb_fill_page_desc_noacc(skb_shinfo(skb), i, page, off, size);
page = compound_head(page);
if (page_is_pfmemalloc(page))
skb->pfmemalloc = true;
diff --git a/net/core/datagram.c b/net/core/datagram.c
index 46526af40552..f8f147e14d1c 100644
--- a/net/core/datagram.c
+++ b/net/core/datagram.c
@@ -619,7 +619,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_copy_datagram_from_iter);
static int __zerocopy_sg_from_bvec(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct iov_iter *from, size_t length)
{
- int ret, frag = skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags;
+ struct skb_shared_info *shinfo = skb_shinfo(skb);
+ int ret, frag = shinfo->nr_frags;
struct bvec_iter bi;
struct bio_vec v;
ssize_t copied = 0;
@@ -638,11 +639,13 @@ static int __zerocopy_sg_from_bvec(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
v = mp_bvec_iter_bvec(from->bvec, bi);
copied += v.bv_len;
truesize += PAGE_ALIGN(v.bv_len + v.bv_offset);
- skb_fill_page_desc(skb, frag++, v.bv_page, v.bv_offset, v.bv_len);
+ __skb_fill_page_desc_noacc(shinfo, frag++, v.bv_page,
+ v.bv_offset, v.bv_len);
bvec_iter_advance_single(from->bvec, &bi, v.bv_len);
}
ret = 0;
out:
+ shinfo->nr_frags = frag;
skb->data_len += copied;
skb->len += copied;
skb->truesize += truesize;
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists