| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 04:55:08 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Antony Antony <antony.antony@...unet.com>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, Thomas Egerer <thomas.egerer@...unet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Antony Antony <antony.antony@...unet.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next v2] xfrm: rate limit SA mapping change message
to user space
Hi Antony,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on klassert-ipsec-next/master]
[also build test ERROR on klassert-ipsec/master net-next/master net/master v5.16-rc6 next-20211221]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Antony-Antony/xfrm-rate-limit-SA-mapping-change-message-to-user-space/20211218-004825
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/klassert/ipsec-next.git master
config: x86_64-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20211222/202112220439.Errml0C2-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/0deffb6fd76e1afc0a82880f4ab1b7a32517cd2e
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Antony-Antony/xfrm-rate-limit-SA-mapping-change-message-to-user-space/20211218-004825
git checkout 0deffb6fd76e1afc0a82880f4ab1b7a32517cd2e
# save the config file to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from <command-line>:
In function 'xfrm_xlate32_attr',
inlined from 'xfrm_xlate32' at net/xfrm/xfrm_compat.c:571:9:
>> include/linux/compiler_types.h:335:38: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_1663' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: XFRMA_MAX != XFRMA_IF_ID
335 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
| ^
include/linux/compiler_types.h:316:4: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert'
316 | prefix ## suffix(); \
| ^~~~~~
include/linux/compiler_types.h:335:2: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert'
335 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert'
39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/build_bug.h:50:2: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
50 | BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/xfrm/xfrm_compat.c:434:3: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON'
434 | BUILD_BUG_ON(XFRMA_MAX != XFRMA_IF_ID);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
In function 'xfrm_xlate64_attr',
inlined from 'xfrm_xlate64' at net/xfrm/xfrm_compat.c:308:10,
inlined from 'xfrm_alloc_compat' at net/xfrm/xfrm_compat.c:338:8:
include/linux/compiler_types.h:335:38: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_1656' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: XFRMA_MAX != XFRMA_IF_ID
335 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
| ^
include/linux/compiler_types.h:316:4: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert'
316 | prefix ## suffix(); \
| ^~~~~~
include/linux/compiler_types.h:335:2: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert'
335 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert'
39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/build_bug.h:50:2: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
50 | BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/xfrm/xfrm_compat.c:279:3: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON'
279 | BUILD_BUG_ON(XFRMA_MAX != XFRMA_IF_ID);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/__compiletime_assert_1663 +335 include/linux/compiler_types.h
eb5c2d4b45e3d2d Will Deacon 2020-07-21 321
eb5c2d4b45e3d2d Will Deacon 2020-07-21 322 #define _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, prefix, suffix) \
eb5c2d4b45e3d2d Will Deacon 2020-07-21 323 __compiletime_assert(condition, msg, prefix, suffix)
eb5c2d4b45e3d2d Will Deacon 2020-07-21 324
eb5c2d4b45e3d2d Will Deacon 2020-07-21 325 /**
eb5c2d4b45e3d2d Will Deacon 2020-07-21 326 * compiletime_assert - break build and emit msg if condition is false
eb5c2d4b45e3d2d Will Deacon 2020-07-21 327 * @condition: a compile-time constant condition to check
eb5c2d4b45e3d2d Will Deacon 2020-07-21 328 * @msg: a message to emit if condition is false
eb5c2d4b45e3d2d Will Deacon 2020-07-21 329 *
eb5c2d4b45e3d2d Will Deacon 2020-07-21 330 * In tradition of POSIX assert, this macro will break the build if the
eb5c2d4b45e3d2d Will Deacon 2020-07-21 331 * supplied condition is *false*, emitting the supplied error message if the
eb5c2d4b45e3d2d Will Deacon 2020-07-21 332 * compiler has support to do so.
eb5c2d4b45e3d2d Will Deacon 2020-07-21 333 */
eb5c2d4b45e3d2d Will Deacon 2020-07-21 334 #define compiletime_assert(condition, msg) \
eb5c2d4b45e3d2d Will Deacon 2020-07-21 @335 _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
eb5c2d4b45e3d2d Will Deacon 2020-07-21 336
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists