[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ec2155c-c976-4c9b-1975-c28792bb3144@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 09:21:08 +0800
From: "libaokun (A)" <libaokun1@...wei.com>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
CC: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <keescook@...omium.org>,
<yzaikin@...gle.com>, <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>,
<andrii@...nel.org>, <kafai@...com>, <songliubraving@...com>,
<yhs@...com>, <john.fastabend@...il.com>, <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
<yukuai3@...wei.com>, Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>,
Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next V2] sysctl: returns -EINVAL when a negative value is
passed to proc_doulongvec_minmax
在 2021/12/21 3:17, Luis Chamberlain 写道:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 05:26:27PM +0800, Baokun Li wrote:
>> When we pass a negative value to the proc_doulongvec_minmax() function,
>> the function returns 0, but the corresponding interface value does not
>> change.
>>
>> we can easily reproduce this problem with the following commands:
>> `cd /proc/sys/fs/epoll`
>> `echo -1 > max_user_watches; echo $?; cat max_user_watches`
>>
>> This function requires a non-negative number to be passed in, so when
>> a negative number is passed in, -EINVAL is returned.
>>
>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
> Acked-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
>
> Luis
> .
Thank you for your Ack.
--
With Best Regards,
Baokun Li
Powered by blists - more mailing lists