[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB3367FA42221280DBD9ADDDC4FC7D9@BYAPR11MB3367.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 04:18:34 +0000
From: "G, GurucharanX" <gurucharanx.g@...el.com>
To: Ruud Bos <kernel.hbk@...il.com>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
"Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"richardcochran@...il.com" <richardcochran@...il.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] igb: support PEROUT on
82580/i354/i350
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@...osl.org> On Behalf Of Ruud
> Bos
> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2021 8:05 PM
> To: Brandeburg, Jesse <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>; Nguyen, Anthony L
> <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>; intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; richardcochran@...il.com; Ruud Bos
> <kernel.hbk@...il.com>; davem@...emloft.net; kuba@...nel.org
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] igb: support PEROUT on
> 82580/i354/i350
>
> Support for the PEROUT PTP pin function on 82580/i354/i350 based adapters.
> Because the time registers of these adapters do not have the nice split in
> second rollovers as the i210 has, the implementation is slightly more complex
> compared to the i210 implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ruud Bos <kernel.hbk@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 59 +++++++++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
Tested-by: Gurucharan G <gurucharanx.g@...el.com> (A Contingent worker at Intel)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists