[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211228101435.3a55b983@coco.lan>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 10:15:16 +0100
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Nick Hu <nickhu@...estech.com>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>,
H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Karsten Keil <isdn@...ux-pingi.de>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Sathya Prakash <sathya.prakash@...adcom.com>,
Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@...adcom.com>,
Suganath Prabu Subramani
<suganath-prabu.subramani@...adcom.com>,
Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@...gutronix.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>, Jouni Malinen <j@...fi>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@...adcom.com>,
Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@...adcom.com>,
Shivasharan S <shivasharan.srikanteshwara@...adcom.com>,
Nilesh Javali <njavali@...vell.com>,
GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@...vell.com,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
Teddy Wang <teddy.wang@...iconmotion.com>,
Forest Bond <forest@...ttletooquiet.net>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@...adcom.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, megaraidlinux.pdl@...adcom.com,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 01/32] Kconfig: introduce and depend on LEGACY_PCI
Em Tue, 28 Dec 2021 09:21:23 +0100
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> escreveu:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 05:42:46PM +0100, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/pci/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/Kconfig
> > @@ -23,6 +23,17 @@ menuconfig PCI
> >
> > if PCI
> >
> > +config LEGACY_PCI
> > + bool "Enable support for legacy PCI devices"
> > + depends on HAVE_PCI
> > + help
> > + This option enables support for legacy PCI devices. This includes
> > + PCI devices attached directly or via a bridge on a PCI Express bus.
> > + It also includes compatibility features on PCI Express devices which
> > + make use of legacy I/O spaces.
This Kconfig doesn't seem what it is needed there, as this should be an
arch-dependent feature, and not something that the poor user should be
aware if a given architecture supports it or not. Also, the above will keep
causing warnings or errors with randconfigs.
Also, the "depends on HAVE_CPI" is bogus, as PCI already depends on
HAVE_PCI:
menuconfig PCI
bool "PCI support"
depends on HAVE_PCI
help
This option enables support for the PCI local bus, including
support for PCI-X and the foundations for PCI Express support.
Say 'Y' here unless you know what you are doing.
So, instead, I would expect that a new HAVE_xxx option would be
added at arch/*/Kconfig, like:
config X86
...
select HAVE_PCI_DIRECT_IO
It would also make sense to document it at Documentation/features/.
>
> All you really care about is the "legacy" I/O spaces here, this isn't
> tied to PCI specifically at all, right?
>
> So why not just have a OLD_STYLE_IO config option or something like
> that, to show that it's the i/o functions we care about here, not PCI at
> all?
>
> And maybe not call it "old" or "legacy" as time constantly goes forward,
> just describe it as it is, "DIRECT_IO"?
Agreed. HAVE_PCI_DIRECT_IO (or something similar) seems a more appropriate
name for it.
Thanks,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists