lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 06:23:19 -0800 From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com> To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>, Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>, Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net_tstamp: define new flag HWTSTAMP_FLAG_BONDED_PHC_INDEX On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 04:09:37PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote: > As we defined the new hwtstamp_config flag HWTSTAMP_FLAG_BONDED_PHC_INDEX > as enum, it's not easy for userspace program to check if the flag is > supported when build. > > Let's define the new flag so user space could build it on old kernel with > ifdef check. > > Fixes: 9c9211a3fc7a ("net_tstamp: add new flag HWTSTAMP_FLAG_BONDED_PHC_INDEX") > Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com> Acked-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists