[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211229142319.GA4912@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 06:23:19 -0800
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net_tstamp: define new flag
HWTSTAMP_FLAG_BONDED_PHC_INDEX
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 04:09:37PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> As we defined the new hwtstamp_config flag HWTSTAMP_FLAG_BONDED_PHC_INDEX
> as enum, it's not easy for userspace program to check if the flag is
> supported when build.
>
> Let's define the new flag so user space could build it on old kernel with
> ifdef check.
>
> Fixes: 9c9211a3fc7a ("net_tstamp: add new flag HWTSTAMP_FLAG_BONDED_PHC_INDEX")
> Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Acked-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists