[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADxym3ZfdbUszBvW4LJRzPkJwBaX2g_5+P1_i_BHPKhiatAXVA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 10:36:46 +0800
From: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
jonathan.lemon@...il.com, alobakin@...me,
Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, talalahmad@...gle.com,
haokexin@...il.com, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>, atenart@...nel.org,
bigeasy@...utronix.de, Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>, arnd@...db.de,
vvs@...tuozzo.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: skb: use kfree_skb_with_reason() in tcp_v4_rcv()
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 4:18 AM David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/29/21 7:32 AM, menglong8.dong@...il.com wrote:
> > From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>
> >
> > Replace kfree_skb() with kfree_skb_with_reason() in tcp_v4_rcv().
> > Following drop reason are added:
> >
> > SKB_DROP_REASON_NO_SOCK
> > SKB_DROP_REASON_BAD_PACKET
> > SKB_DROP_REASON_TCP_CSUM
> >
> > After this patch, 'kfree_skb' event will print message like this:
> >
> > $ TASK-PID CPU# ||||| TIMESTAMP FUNCTION
> > $ | | | ||||| | |
> > <idle>-0 [000] ..s1. 36.113438: kfree_skb: skbaddr=(____ptrval____) protocol=2048 location=(____ptrval____) reason: NO_SOCK
> >
> > The reason of skb drop is printed too.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/skbuff.h | 3 +++
> > include/trace/events/skb.h | 3 +++
> > net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 10 ++++++++--
>
> your first patch set was targeting UDP and now you are starting with tcp?
Yeah, I think TCP is used more, which can be a good starting point. After
all, general protocols are all my target.
>
>
> > 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> > index 3620b3ff2154..f85db6c035d1 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> > @@ -313,6 +313,9 @@ struct sk_buff;
> > */
> > enum skb_drop_reason {
> > SKB_DROP_REASON_NOT_SPECIFIED,
> > + SKB_DROP_REASON_NO_SOCK,
>
> SKB_DROP_REASON_NO_SOCKET
>
> > + SKB_DROP_REASON_BAD_PACKET,
>
> SKB_DROP_REASON_PKT_TOO_SMALL
>
> User oriented messages, not code based.
>
Ok, get it!
Thanks!
Menglong Dong
>
> > + SKB_DROP_REASON_TCP_CSUM,
> > SKB_DROP_REASON_MAX,
> > };
> >
> > diff --git a/include/trace/events/skb.h b/include/trace/events/skb.h
> > index cab1c08a30cd..b9ea6b4ed7ec 100644
> > --- a/include/trace/events/skb.h
> > +++ b/include/trace/events/skb.h
> > @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@
> >
> > #define TRACE_SKB_DROP_REASON \
> > EM(SKB_DROP_REASON_NOT_SPECIFIED, NOT_SPECIFIED) \
> > + EM(SKB_DROP_REASON_NO_SOCK, NO_SOCK) \
> > + EM(SKB_DROP_REASON_BAD_PACKET, BAD_PACKET) \
> > + EM(SKB_DROP_REASON_TCP_CSUM, TCP_CSUM) \
> > EMe(SKB_DROP_REASON_MAX, HAHA_MAX)
> >
> > #undef EM
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> > index ac10e4cdd8d0..03dc4c79b84b 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> > @@ -1971,8 +1971,10 @@ int tcp_v4_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > const struct tcphdr *th;
> > bool refcounted;
> > struct sock *sk;
> > + int drop_reason;
> > int ret;
> >
> > + drop_reason = 0;
>
> drop_reason = SKB_DROP_REASON_NOT_SPECIFIED;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists