| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20211230080305.1068950-3-imagedong@tencent.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 16:03:05 +0800
From: menglong8.dong@...il.com
To: kuba@...nel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, dsahern@...nel.org,
edumazet@...gle.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org, kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/2] bpf: selftests: add bind retry for post_bind{4, 6}
From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>
With previous patch, kernel is able to 'put_port' after sys_bind()
fails. Add the test for that case: rebind another port after
sys_bind() fails. If the bind success, it means previous bind
operation is already undoed.
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c | 166 +++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 146 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c
index e8edd3dd3ec2..68525d68d4e5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c
@@ -35,12 +35,15 @@ struct sock_test {
/* Endpoint to bind() to */
const char *ip;
unsigned short port;
+ unsigned short port_retry;
/* Expected test result */
enum {
LOAD_REJECT,
ATTACH_REJECT,
BIND_REJECT,
SUCCESS,
+ RETRY_SUCCESS,
+ RETRY_REJECT
} result;
};
@@ -60,6 +63,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
0,
NULL,
0,
+ 0,
LOAD_REJECT,
},
{
@@ -77,6 +81,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
0,
NULL,
0,
+ 0,
LOAD_REJECT,
},
{
@@ -94,6 +99,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
0,
NULL,
0,
+ 0,
LOAD_REJECT,
},
{
@@ -111,6 +117,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
0,
NULL,
0,
+ 0,
LOAD_REJECT,
},
{
@@ -125,6 +132,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
SOCK_STREAM,
"127.0.0.1",
8097,
+ 0,
SUCCESS,
},
{
@@ -139,6 +147,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
SOCK_STREAM,
"127.0.0.1",
8097,
+ 0,
SUCCESS,
},
{
@@ -153,6 +162,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
0,
NULL,
0,
+ 0,
ATTACH_REJECT,
},
{
@@ -167,6 +177,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
0,
NULL,
0,
+ 0,
ATTACH_REJECT,
},
{
@@ -181,6 +192,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
0,
NULL,
0,
+ 0,
ATTACH_REJECT,
},
{
@@ -195,6 +207,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
0,
NULL,
0,
+ 0,
ATTACH_REJECT,
},
{
@@ -209,6 +222,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
SOCK_STREAM,
"0.0.0.0",
0,
+ 0,
BIND_REJECT,
},
{
@@ -223,6 +237,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
SOCK_STREAM,
"::",
0,
+ 0,
BIND_REJECT,
},
{
@@ -253,6 +268,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
SOCK_STREAM,
"::1",
8193,
+ 0,
BIND_REJECT,
},
{
@@ -283,8 +299,102 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
SOCK_STREAM,
"127.0.0.1",
4098,
+ 0,
SUCCESS,
},
+ {
+ "bind4 deny specific IP & port of TCP, and retry",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
+
+ /* if (ip == expected && port == expected) */
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_6,
+ offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_ip4)),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7,
+ __bpf_constant_ntohl(0x7F000001), 4),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_6,
+ offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_port)),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7, 0x1002, 2),
+
+ /* return DENY; */
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_JMP_A(1),
+
+ /* else return ALLOW; */
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ BPF_CGROUP_INET4_POST_BIND,
+ BPF_CGROUP_INET4_POST_BIND,
+ AF_INET,
+ SOCK_STREAM,
+ "127.0.0.1",
+ 4098,
+ 5000,
+ RETRY_SUCCESS,
+ },
+ {
+ "bind4 deny specific IP & port of UDP, and retry",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
+
+ /* if (ip == expected && port == expected) */
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_6,
+ offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_ip4)),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7,
+ __bpf_constant_ntohl(0x7F000001), 4),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_6,
+ offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_port)),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7, 0x1002, 2),
+
+ /* return DENY; */
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_JMP_A(1),
+
+ /* else return ALLOW; */
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ BPF_CGROUP_INET4_POST_BIND,
+ BPF_CGROUP_INET4_POST_BIND,
+ AF_INET,
+ SOCK_DGRAM,
+ "127.0.0.1",
+ 4098,
+ 5000,
+ RETRY_SUCCESS,
+ },
+ {
+ "bind6 deny specific IP & port, and retry",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
+
+ /* if (ip == expected && port == expected) */
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_6,
+ offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_ip6[3])),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7,
+ __bpf_constant_ntohl(0x00000001), 4),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_6,
+ offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_port)),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7, 0x2001, 2),
+
+ /* return DENY; */
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_JMP_A(1),
+
+ /* else return ALLOW; */
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ BPF_CGROUP_INET6_POST_BIND,
+ BPF_CGROUP_INET6_POST_BIND,
+ AF_INET6,
+ SOCK_STREAM,
+ "::1",
+ 8193,
+ 9000,
+ RETRY_SUCCESS,
+ },
{
"bind4 allow all",
.insns = {
@@ -297,6 +407,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
SOCK_STREAM,
"0.0.0.0",
0,
+ 0,
SUCCESS,
},
{
@@ -311,6 +422,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
SOCK_STREAM,
"::",
0,
+ 0,
SUCCESS,
},
};
@@ -351,14 +463,15 @@ static int attach_sock_prog(int cgfd, int progfd,
return bpf_prog_attach(progfd, cgfd, attach_type, BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE);
}
-static int bind_sock(int domain, int type, const char *ip, unsigned short port)
+static int bind_sock(int domain, int type, const char *ip,
+ unsigned short port, unsigned short port_retry)
{
struct sockaddr_storage addr;
struct sockaddr_in6 *addr6;
struct sockaddr_in *addr4;
int sockfd = -1;
socklen_t len;
- int err = 0;
+ int res = SUCCESS;
sockfd = socket(domain, type, 0);
if (sockfd < 0)
@@ -384,21 +497,44 @@ static int bind_sock(int domain, int type, const char *ip, unsigned short port)
goto err;
}
- if (bind(sockfd, (const struct sockaddr *)&addr, len) == -1)
- goto err;
+ if (bind(sockfd, (const struct sockaddr *)&addr, len) == -1) {
+ /* sys_bind() may fail for different reasons, errno has to be
+ * checked to confirm that BPF program rejected it.
+ */
+ if (errno != EPERM)
+ goto err;
+ if (port_retry)
+ goto retry;
+ res = BIND_REJECT;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ goto out;
+retry:
+ if (domain == AF_INET)
+ addr4->sin_port = htons(port_retry);
+ else
+ addr6->sin6_port = htons(port_retry);
+ if (bind(sockfd, (const struct sockaddr *)&addr, len) == -1) {
+ if (errno != EPERM)
+ goto err;
+ res = RETRY_REJECT;
+ } else {
+ res = RETRY_SUCCESS;
+ }
goto out;
err:
- err = -1;
+ res = -1;
out:
close(sockfd);
- return err;
+ return res;
}
static int run_test_case(int cgfd, const struct sock_test *test)
{
int progfd = -1;
int err = 0;
+ int res;
printf("Test case: %s .. ", test->descr);
progfd = load_sock_prog(test->insns, test->expected_attach_type);
@@ -416,21 +552,11 @@ static int run_test_case(int cgfd, const struct sock_test *test)
goto err;
}
- if (bind_sock(test->domain, test->type, test->ip, test->port) == -1) {
- /* sys_bind() may fail for different reasons, errno has to be
- * checked to confirm that BPF program rejected it.
- */
- if (test->result == BIND_REJECT && errno == EPERM)
- goto out;
- else
- goto err;
- }
-
+ res = bind_sock(test->domain, test->type, test->ip, test->port,
+ test->port_retry);
+ if (res > 0 && test->result == res)
+ goto out;
- if (test->result != SUCCESS)
- goto err;
-
- goto out;
err:
err = -1;
out:
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists