[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220103092142.102c272f@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 09:21:42 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: "Kumar, M Chetan" <m.chetan.kumar@...el.com>
Cc: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linuxwwan <linuxwwan@...el.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>,
"Sergey Ryazanov" <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: wwan: iosm: Keep device at D0 for s2idle case
On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 15:28:18 +0000 Kumar, M Chetan wrote:
> > Dave, can you drop it from netdev until IOSM devs confirm this patch is
> > correct?
>
> Dave, please drop this patch from netdev.
YMMV but these sort of requests aren't usually acted on. netdev doesn't
rebase so revert is needed, and the developers involved are best at
writing commit messages for those since they have all the context.
So sending a revert patch, with Link to the discussion and context
explained is the best way.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists