[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220104171413.2293847-3-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 19:14:00 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 02/15] net: dsa: merge rtnl_lock sections in dsa_slave_create
Currently dsa_slave_create() has two sequences of rtnl_lock/rtnl_unlock
in a row. Remove the rtnl_unlock() and rtnl_lock() in between, such that
the operation can execute slighly faster.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
---
net/dsa/slave.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/dsa/slave.c b/net/dsa/slave.c
index 88bcdba92fa7..22241afcac81 100644
--- a/net/dsa/slave.c
+++ b/net/dsa/slave.c
@@ -2022,14 +2022,12 @@ int dsa_slave_create(struct dsa_port *port)
}
rtnl_lock();
+
ret = dsa_slave_change_mtu(slave_dev, ETH_DATA_LEN);
- rtnl_unlock();
if (ret && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)
dev_warn(ds->dev, "nonfatal error %d setting MTU to %d on port %d\n",
ret, ETH_DATA_LEN, port->index);
- rtnl_lock();
-
ret = register_netdevice(slave_dev);
if (ret) {
netdev_err(master, "error %d registering interface %s\n",
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists