| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 22:20:36 +0000
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>
CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 08/15] net: dsa: remove cross-chip support for
HSR
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 04:03:56PM -0600, George McCollister wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 11:14 AM Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com> wrote:
> >
> > The cross-chip notifiers for HSR are bypass operations, meaning that
> > even though all switches in a tree are notified, only the switch
> > specified in the info structure is targeted.
> >
> > We can eliminate the unnecessary complexity by deleting the cross-chip
> > notifier logic and calling the ds->ops straight from port.c.
> >
> > Cc: George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> > ---
> > net/dsa/dsa_priv.h | 2 --
> > net/dsa/port.c | 20 ++++++--------------
> > net/dsa/switch.c | 24 ------------------------
> > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h b/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h
> > index 54c23479b9ba..b3386d408fc6 100644
> > --- a/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h
> > +++ b/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h
> > @@ -25,8 +25,6 @@ enum {
> > DSA_NOTIFIER_FDB_DEL,
> > DSA_NOTIFIER_HOST_FDB_ADD,
> > DSA_NOTIFIER_HOST_FDB_DEL,
> > - DSA_NOTIFIER_HSR_JOIN,
> > - DSA_NOTIFIER_HSR_LEAVE,
> > DSA_NOTIFIER_LAG_CHANGE,
> > DSA_NOTIFIER_LAG_JOIN,
> > DSA_NOTIFIER_LAG_LEAVE,
> > diff --git a/net/dsa/port.c b/net/dsa/port.c
> > index 5c72f890c6a2..9e7c421c47b9 100644
> > --- a/net/dsa/port.c
> > +++ b/net/dsa/port.c
> > @@ -1317,16 +1317,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dsa_port_get_phy_sset_count);
> >
> > int dsa_port_hsr_join(struct dsa_port *dp, struct net_device *hsr)
> > {
> > - struct dsa_notifier_hsr_info info = {
> > - .sw_index = dp->ds->index,
> > - .port = dp->index,
> > - .hsr = hsr,
> > - };
> > + struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
> > int err;
> >
> > dp->hsr_dev = hsr;
> >
> > - err = dsa_port_notify(dp, DSA_NOTIFIER_HSR_JOIN, &info);
> > + err = ds->ops->port_hsr_join(ds, dp->index, hsr);
> > if (err)
> > dp->hsr_dev = NULL;
> >
> > @@ -1335,20 +1331,16 @@ int dsa_port_hsr_join(struct dsa_port *dp, struct net_device *hsr)
> >
> > void dsa_port_hsr_leave(struct dsa_port *dp, struct net_device *hsr)
> > {
> > - struct dsa_notifier_hsr_info info = {
> > - .sw_index = dp->ds->index,
> > - .port = dp->index,
> > - .hsr = hsr,
> > - };
> > + struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
> > int err;
> >
> > dp->hsr_dev = NULL;
> >
> > - err = dsa_port_notify(dp, DSA_NOTIFIER_HSR_LEAVE, &info);
> > + err = ds->ops->port_hsr_leave(ds, dp->index, hsr);
> > if (err)
> > dev_err(dp->ds->dev,
> > - "port %d failed to notify DSA_NOTIFIER_HSR_LEAVE: %pe\n",
> > - dp->index, ERR_PTR(err));
> > + "port %d failed to leave HSR %s: %pe\n",
> > + dp->index, hsr->name, ERR_PTR(err));
> > }
> >
> > int dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add(struct dsa_port *dp, u16 vid, bool broadcast)
> > diff --git a/net/dsa/switch.c b/net/dsa/switch.c
> > index a164ec02b4e9..e3c7d2627a61 100644
> > --- a/net/dsa/switch.c
> > +++ b/net/dsa/switch.c
> > @@ -437,24 +437,6 @@ static int dsa_switch_fdb_del(struct dsa_switch *ds,
> > return dsa_port_do_fdb_del(dp, info->addr, info->vid);
> > }
> >
> > -static int dsa_switch_hsr_join(struct dsa_switch *ds,
> > - struct dsa_notifier_hsr_info *info)
> > -{
> > - if (ds->index == info->sw_index && ds->ops->port_hsr_join)
> > - return ds->ops->port_hsr_join(ds, info->port, info->hsr);
> > -
> > - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static int dsa_switch_hsr_leave(struct dsa_switch *ds,
> > - struct dsa_notifier_hsr_info *info)
> > -{
> > - if (ds->index == info->sw_index && ds->ops->port_hsr_leave)
> > - return ds->ops->port_hsr_leave(ds, info->port, info->hsr);
> > -
> > - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > -}
> > -
> > static int dsa_switch_lag_change(struct dsa_switch *ds,
> > struct dsa_notifier_lag_info *info)
> > {
> > @@ -729,12 +711,6 @@ static int dsa_switch_event(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > case DSA_NOTIFIER_HOST_FDB_DEL:
> > err = dsa_switch_host_fdb_del(ds, info);
> > break;
> > - case DSA_NOTIFIER_HSR_JOIN:
> > - err = dsa_switch_hsr_join(ds, info);
> > - break;
> > - case DSA_NOTIFIER_HSR_LEAVE:
> > - err = dsa_switch_hsr_leave(ds, info);
> > - break;
> > case DSA_NOTIFIER_LAG_CHANGE:
> > err = dsa_switch_lag_change(ds, info);
> > break;
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
>
> Looks good.
>
> Reviewed-by: George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>
The irony is that the check for the presence of ds->ops->port_hsr_join
and ds->ops->port_hsr_leave vanished. So this is broken, we'd get a NULL
pointer dereference now instead of -EOPNOTSUPP. Sorry for the noise.
I'll add this to the list of things to change when I resend.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists