[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <72368c25-83c5-565f-0512-ca5d58315685@iogearbox.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 16:30:49 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Paul Blakey <paulb@...dia.com>, dev@...nvswitch.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@....org>, davem@...emloft.net,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Oz Shlomo <ozsh@...dia.com>,
Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>, Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>,
john.fastabend@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] net: openvswitch: Fix ct_state nat flags for
conns arriving from tc
On 1/5/22 3:57 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> On 2022-01-04 03:28, Paul Blakey wrote:
> [..]
>> --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
>> @@ -287,7 +287,9 @@ struct tc_skb_ext {
>> __u32 chain;
>> __u16 mru;
>> __u16 zone;
>> - bool post_ct;
>> + bool post_ct:1;
>> + bool post_ct_snat:1;
>> + bool post_ct_dnat:1;
>> };
>
> is skb_ext intended only for ovs? If yes, why does it belong
> in the core code? Ex: Looking at tcf_classify() which is such
> a core function in the fast path any packet going via tc, it
> is now encumbered with with checking presence of skb_ext.
> I know passing around metadata is a paramount requirement
> for programmability but this is getting messier with speacial
> use cases for ovs and/or offload...
Full ack on the bloat for corner cases like ovs offload, especially
given distros just enable most stuff anyway and therefore no light
fast path as with !CONFIG_NET_TC_SKB_EXT. :(
Could this somehow be hidden behind static key or such if offloads
are not used, so we can shrink it back to just calling into plain
__tcf_classify() for sw-only use cases (like BPF)?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists