lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 5 Jan 2022 16:30:49 +0100
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Paul Blakey <paulb@...dia.com>, dev@...nvswitch.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@....org>, davem@...emloft.net,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Oz Shlomo <ozsh@...dia.com>,
        Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>, Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>,
        john.fastabend@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] net: openvswitch: Fix ct_state nat flags for
 conns arriving from tc

On 1/5/22 3:57 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> On 2022-01-04 03:28, Paul Blakey wrote:
> [..]
>> --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
>> @@ -287,7 +287,9 @@ struct tc_skb_ext {
>>       __u32 chain;
>>       __u16 mru;
>>       __u16 zone;
>> -    bool post_ct;
>> +    bool post_ct:1;
>> +    bool post_ct_snat:1;
>> +    bool post_ct_dnat:1;
>>   };
> 
> is skb_ext intended only for ovs? If yes, why does it belong
> in the core code? Ex: Looking at tcf_classify() which is such
> a core function in the fast path any packet going via tc, it
> is now encumbered with with checking presence of skb_ext.
> I know passing around metadata is a paramount requirement
> for programmability but this is getting messier with speacial
> use cases for ovs and/or offload...

Full ack on the bloat for corner cases like ovs offload, especially
given distros just enable most stuff anyway and therefore no light
fast path as with !CONFIG_NET_TC_SKB_EXT. :(

Could this somehow be hidden behind static key or such if offloads
are not used, so we can shrink it back to just calling into plain
__tcf_classify() for sw-only use cases (like BPF)?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ