[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YdYbZne6pBZzxSxA@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 23:27:50 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
Cc: Aaron Ma <aaron.ma@...onical.com>, kuba@...nel.org,
henning.schild@...mens.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, hayeswang@...ltek.com, tiwai@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v3] net: usb: r8152: Check used MAC passthrough
address
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 10:49:56PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> On 05.01.22 18:30, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 11:14:25PM +0800, Aaron Ma wrote:
> >> When plugin multiple r8152 ethernet dongles to Lenovo Docks
> >> or USB hub, MAC passthrough address from BIOS should be
> >> checked if it had been used to avoid using on other dongles.
> >>
> >> Currently builtin r8152 on Dock still can't be identified.
> >> First detected r8152 will use the MAC passthrough address.
> > I do have to wonder why you are doing this in the kernel, and not
> > using a udev rule? This seems to be policy, and policy does not belong
> > in the kernel.
> Debatable. An ethernet NIC has to have a MAC. The kernel must
> provide one. That we should always take the one found in the
> device's ROM rather than the host's ROM is already a policy decision.
In general, it is a much longer list of places to find the MAC address
from. It could be in three different places in device tree, it could
be in ACPI in a similar number of places, it could be in NVMEM,
pointed to by device tree, the bootloader might of already programmed
the controller with its MAC address, etc, or if everything else fails,
it could be random.
So yes, the kernel will give it one. But if you want the interface to
have a specific MAC address, you probably should not be trusting the
kernel, given it has so many options.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists