[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220106091350.3038869-4-steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 10:13:46 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] net: xfrm: drop check of pols[0] for the second time
From: Jean Sacren <sakiwit@...il.com>
!pols[0] is checked earlier. If we don't return, pols[0] is always
true. We should drop the check of pols[0] for the second time and the
binary is also smaller.
Before:
text data bss dec hex filename
48395 957 240 49592 c1b8 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.o
After:
text data bss dec hex filename
48379 957 240 49576 c1a8 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.o
Signed-off-by: Jean Sacren <sakiwit@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index edc673e78114..9341298b2a70 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -2680,7 +2680,7 @@ static int xfrm_expand_policies(const struct flowi *fl, u16 family,
*num_xfrms = pols[0]->xfrm_nr;
#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_SUB_POLICY
- if (pols[0] && pols[0]->action == XFRM_POLICY_ALLOW &&
+ if (pols[0]->action == XFRM_POLICY_ALLOW &&
pols[0]->type != XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_MAIN) {
pols[1] = xfrm_policy_lookup_bytype(xp_net(pols[0]),
XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_MAIN,
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists