[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220107090042.13605-1-linyunsheng@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 17:00:42 +0800
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<hawk@...nel.org>, <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] page_pool: remove spinlock in page_pool_refill_alloc_cache()
As page_pool_refill_alloc_cache() is only called by
__page_pool_get_cached(), which assumes non-concurrent access
as suggested by the comment in __page_pool_get_cached(), and
ptr_ring allows concurrent access between consumer and producer,
so remove the spinlock in page_pool_refill_alloc_cache().
Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
---
net/core/page_pool.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/page_pool.c b/net/core/page_pool.c
index 1a6978427d6c..6efad8b29e9c 100644
--- a/net/core/page_pool.c
+++ b/net/core/page_pool.c
@@ -130,9 +130,6 @@ static struct page *page_pool_refill_alloc_cache(struct page_pool *pool)
pref_nid = numa_mem_id(); /* will be zero like page_to_nid() */
#endif
- /* Slower-path: Get pages from locked ring queue */
- spin_lock(&r->consumer_lock);
-
/* Refill alloc array, but only if NUMA match */
do {
page = __ptr_ring_consume(r);
@@ -157,7 +154,6 @@ static struct page *page_pool_refill_alloc_cache(struct page_pool *pool)
if (likely(pool->alloc.count > 0))
page = pool->alloc.cache[--pool->alloc.count];
- spin_unlock(&r->consumer_lock);
return page;
}
--
2.33.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists