netdev - [PATCH net-next 07/13] mptcp: fix per socket endpoint accounting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220107002026.375427-8-mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu,  6 Jan 2022 16:20:20 -0800
From:   Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org, matthieu.baerts@...sares.net,
        mptcp@...ts.linux.dev,
        Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 07/13] mptcp: fix per socket endpoint accounting

From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>

Since full-mesh endpoint support, the reception of a single ADD_ADDR
option can cause multiple subflows creation. When such option is
accepted we increment 'add_addr_accepted' by one. When we received
a paired RM_ADDR option, we deleted all the relevant subflows,
decrementing 'add_addr_accepted' by one for each of them.

We have a similar issue for 'local_addr_used'

Fix them moving the pm endpoint accounting outside the subflow
traversal.

Fixes: 1a0d6136c5f0 ("mptcp: local addresses fullmesh")
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>
---
 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
index 6cde58c259a8..27427aeeee0e 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -711,6 +711,8 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_or_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
 		return;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < rm_list->nr; i++) {
+		bool removed = false;
+
 		list_for_each_entry_safe(subflow, tmp, &msk->conn_list, node) {
 			struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
 			int how = RCV_SHUTDOWN | SEND_SHUTDOWN;
@@ -730,15 +732,19 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_or_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
 			mptcp_close_ssk(sk, ssk, subflow);
 			spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
 
-			if (rm_type == MPTCP_MIB_RMADDR) {
-				msk->pm.add_addr_accepted--;
-				WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.accept_addr, true);
-			} else if (rm_type == MPTCP_MIB_RMSUBFLOW) {
-				msk->pm.local_addr_used--;
-			}
+			removed = true;
 			msk->pm.subflows--;
 			__MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), rm_type);
 		}
+		if (!removed)
+			continue;
+
+		if (rm_type == MPTCP_MIB_RMADDR) {
+			msk->pm.add_addr_accepted--;
+			WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.accept_addr, true);
+		} else if (rm_type == MPTCP_MIB_RMSUBFLOW) {
+			msk->pm.local_addr_used--;
+		}
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.34.1