lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOkoqZkCkyiGbUx--zY67GF05Y_XxuW6APKaqYu8F_nR9Qu7Kg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Jan 2022 16:53:08 -0800
From:   Dimitris Michailidis <d.michailidis@...gible.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/8] net/funeth: probing and netdev ops

On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 8:12 AM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> > > > +     if ((notif->link_state | notif->missed_events) & FUN_PORT_FLAG_MAC_DOWN)
> > > > +             netif_carrier_off(netdev);
> > > > +     if (notif->link_state & FUN_PORT_FLAG_NH_DOWN)
> > > > +             netif_dormant_on(netdev);
> > > > +     if (notif->link_state & FUN_PORT_FLAG_NH_UP)
> > > > +             netif_dormant_off(netdev);
> > >
> > > What does this do?
> >
> > FW may get exclusive access to the ports in some cases and during those times
> > host traffic isn't serviced. Changing a port to dormant is its way of
> > telling the host
> > the port is unavailable though it has link up.
>
> Quoting RFC2863
>
> 3.1.12.  New states for IfOperStatus
>
>    Three new states have been added to ifOperStatus: 'dormant',
>    'notPresent', and 'lowerLayerDown'.
>
>    The dormant state indicates that the relevant interface is not
>    actually in a condition to pass packets (i.e., it is not 'up') but is
>    in a "pending" state, waiting for some external event.  For "on-
>    demand" interfaces, this new state identifies the situation where the
>    interface is waiting for events to place it in the up state.
>    Examples of such events might be:
>
>    (1)   having packets to transmit before establishing a connection to
>          a remote system;
>
>    (2)   having a remote system establish a connection to the interface
>          (e.g. dialing up to a slip-server).
>
> I can see this being valid if your FW is doing 802.1X. But i'm not
> sure it is valid for other use cases. What exactly is your firmware
> doing which stops it from handling frames?

The downtime happens occasionally after link up while the internal
control processor is configuring the network units. So internal setup
delays. I am told that "in the near future" the need for this will be
removed. Trusting that near will be reasonable I'll remove this now.

>
>         Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ