[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220107005831.78909-3-saeed@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 16:58:22 -0800
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Dima Chumak <dchumak@...dia.com>,
Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Subject: [net 02/11] net/mlx5e: Fix nullptr on deleting mirroring rule
From: Dima Chumak <dchumak@...dia.com>
Deleting a Tc rule with multiple outputs, one of which is internal port,
like this one:
tc filter del dev enp8s0f0_0 ingress protocol ip pref 5 flower \
dst_mac 0c:42:a1:d1:d0:88 \
src_mac e4:ea:09:08:00:02 \
action tunnel_key set \
src_ip 0.0.0.0 \
dst_ip 7.7.7.8 \
id 8 \
dst_port 4789 \
action mirred egress mirror dev vxlan_sys_4789 pipe \
action mirred egress redirect dev enp8s0f0_1
Triggers a call trace:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000230
RIP: 0010:del_sw_hw_rule+0x2b/0x1f0 [mlx5_core]
Call Trace:
tree_remove_node+0x16/0x30 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_del_flow_rules+0x51/0x160 [mlx5_core]
__mlx5_eswitch_del_rule+0x4b/0x170 [mlx5_core]
mlx5e_tc_del_fdb_flow+0x295/0x550 [mlx5_core]
mlx5e_flow_put+0x1f/0x70 [mlx5_core]
mlx5e_delete_flower+0x286/0x390 [mlx5_core]
tc_setup_cb_destroy+0xac/0x170
fl_hw_destroy_filter+0x94/0xc0 [cls_flower]
__fl_delete+0x15e/0x170 [cls_flower]
fl_delete+0x36/0x80 [cls_flower]
tc_del_tfilter+0x3a6/0x6e0
rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0xe5/0x360
? rtnl_calcit.isra.0+0x110/0x110
netlink_rcv_skb+0x46/0x110
netlink_unicast+0x16b/0x200
netlink_sendmsg+0x202/0x3d0
sock_sendmsg+0x33/0x40
____sys_sendmsg+0x1c3/0x200
? copy_msghdr_from_user+0xd6/0x150
___sys_sendmsg+0x88/0xd0
? ___sys_recvmsg+0x88/0xc0
? do_futex+0x10c/0x460
__sys_sendmsg+0x59/0xa0
do_syscall_64+0x48/0x140
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
Fix by disabling offloading for flows matching
esw_is_chain_src_port_rewrite() which have more than one output.
Fixes: 10742efc20a4 ("net/mlx5e: VF tunnel TX traffic offloading")
Signed-off-by: Dima Chumak <dchumak@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
---
.../mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c | 28 ++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
index 32bc08a39925..ccb66428aeb5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
@@ -295,26 +295,28 @@ esw_setup_chain_src_port_rewrite(struct mlx5_flow_destination *dest,
int *i)
{
struct mlx5_esw_flow_attr *esw_attr = attr->esw_attr;
- int j, err;
+ int err;
if (!(attr->flags & MLX5_ESW_ATTR_FLAG_SRC_REWRITE))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- for (j = esw_attr->split_count; j < esw_attr->out_count; j++, (*i)++) {
- err = esw_setup_chain_dest(dest, flow_act, chains, attr->dest_chain, 1, 0, *i);
- if (err)
- goto err_setup_chain;
+ /* flow steering cannot handle more than one dest with the same ft
+ * in a single flow
+ */
+ if (esw_attr->out_count - esw_attr->split_count > 1)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- if (esw_attr->dests[j].pkt_reformat) {
- flow_act->action |= MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_PACKET_REFORMAT;
- flow_act->pkt_reformat = esw_attr->dests[j].pkt_reformat;
- }
+ err = esw_setup_chain_dest(dest, flow_act, chains, attr->dest_chain, 1, 0, *i);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ if (esw_attr->dests[esw_attr->split_count].pkt_reformat) {
+ flow_act->action |= MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_PACKET_REFORMAT;
+ flow_act->pkt_reformat = esw_attr->dests[esw_attr->split_count].pkt_reformat;
}
- return 0;
+ (*i)++;
-err_setup_chain:
- esw_put_dest_tables_loop(esw, attr, esw_attr->split_count, j);
- return err;
+ return 0;
}
static void esw_cleanup_chain_src_port_rewrite(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
--
2.33.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists