netdev - [PATCH v3 2/8] rtw88: Move rtw_update_sta_info() out of rtw_ra_mask_info_update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220108005533.947787-3-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Date:   Sat,  8 Jan 2022 01:55:27 +0100
From:   Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To:     linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     tony0620emma@...il.com, kvalo@...eaurora.org,
        johannes@...solutions.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Neo Jou <neojou@...il.com>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
        Pkshih <pkshih@...ltek.com>, Ed Swierk <eswierk@...st>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/8] rtw88: Move rtw_update_sta_info() out of rtw_ra_mask_info_update_iter()

rtw_update_sta_info() internally access some registers while being
called unter an atomic lock acquired by rtw_iterate_vifs_atomic(). Move
rtw_update_sta_info() call out of (rtw_ra_mask_info_update_iter) in
preparation for SDIO support where register access may sleep.

Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
---
v2 -> v3:
- Move the mutex lock (to protect the dta inside br_data.si[i]) to
  rtw_ops_set_bitrate_mask() for consistency with other functions in
  the whole driver (and especially in the same file) as suggested by
  Ping-Ke (thank you!)

v1 -> v2:
- keep rtw_iterate_vifs_atomic() to prevent deadlocks as Johannes
  suggested. Keep track of all relevant stations inside
  rtw_ra_mask_info_update_iter() and the iter-data and then call
  rtw_update_sta_info() while held under rtwdev->mutex instead

 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac80211.c | 12 +++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac80211.c
index ae7d97de5fdf..78e963fcc6e1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac80211.c
@@ -671,6 +671,8 @@ struct rtw_iter_bitrate_mask_data {
 	struct rtw_dev *rtwdev;
 	struct ieee80211_vif *vif;
 	const struct cfg80211_bitrate_mask *mask;
+	unsigned int num_si;
+	struct rtw_sta_info *si[RTW_MAX_MAC_ID_NUM];
 };
 
 static void rtw_ra_mask_info_update_iter(void *data, struct ieee80211_sta *sta)
@@ -691,7 +693,8 @@ static void rtw_ra_mask_info_update_iter(void *data, struct ieee80211_sta *sta)
 	}
 
 	si->use_cfg_mask = true;
-	rtw_update_sta_info(br_data->rtwdev, si);
+
+	br_data->si[br_data->num_si++] = si;
 }
 
 static void rtw_ra_mask_info_update(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
@@ -699,11 +702,16 @@ static void rtw_ra_mask_info_update(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
 				    const struct cfg80211_bitrate_mask *mask)
 {
 	struct rtw_iter_bitrate_mask_data br_data;
+	unsigned int i;
 
 	br_data.rtwdev = rtwdev;
 	br_data.vif = vif;
 	br_data.mask = mask;
+	br_data.num_si = 0;
 	rtw_iterate_stas_atomic(rtwdev, rtw_ra_mask_info_update_iter, &br_data);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < br_data.num_si; i++)
+		rtw_update_sta_info(rtwdev, br_data.si[i]);
 }
 
 static int rtw_ops_set_bitrate_mask(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
@@ -712,7 +720,9 @@ static int rtw_ops_set_bitrate_mask(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 {
 	struct rtw_dev *rtwdev = hw->priv;
 
+	mutex_lock(&rtwdev->mutex);
 	rtw_ra_mask_info_update(rtwdev, vif, mask);
+	mutex_unlock(&rtwdev->mutex);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.34.1