[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1641807505-54454-1-git-send-email-guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:38:25 +0800
From: Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: kgraul@...ux.ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net] net/smc: Avoid setting clcsock options after clcsock released
We encountered a crash in smc_setsockopt() and it is caused by
accessing smc->clcsock after clcsock was released.
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000020
#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
PGD 0 P4D 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
CPU: 1 PID: 50309 Comm: nginx Kdump: loaded Tainted: G E 5.16.0-rc4+ #53
RIP: 0010:smc_setsockopt+0x59/0x280 [smc]
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__sys_setsockopt+0xfc/0x190
__x64_sys_setsockopt+0x20/0x30
do_syscall_64+0x34/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f16ba83918e
</TASK>
This patch tries to fix it by holding clcsock_release_lock and
checking whether clcsock has already been released. In case that
a crash of the same reason happens in smc_getsockopt(), this patch
also checkes smc->clcsock in smc_getsockopt().
Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
net/smc/af_smc.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index 1c9289f..af423f4 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -2441,6 +2441,11 @@ static int smc_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
/* generic setsockopts reaching us here always apply to the
* CLC socket
*/
+ mutex_lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
+ if (!smc->clcsock) {
+ mutex_unlock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
+ return -EBADF;
+ }
if (unlikely(!smc->clcsock->ops->setsockopt))
rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
else
@@ -2450,6 +2455,7 @@ static int smc_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
sk->sk_err = smc->clcsock->sk->sk_err;
sk_error_report(sk);
}
+ mutex_unlock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
if (optlen < sizeof(int))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -2509,13 +2515,21 @@ static int smc_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
char __user *optval, int __user *optlen)
{
struct smc_sock *smc;
+ int rc;
smc = smc_sk(sock->sk);
+ mutex_lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
+ if (!smc->clcsock) {
+ mutex_unlock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
+ return -EBADF;
+ }
/* socket options apply to the CLC socket */
if (unlikely(!smc->clcsock->ops->getsockopt))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- return smc->clcsock->ops->getsockopt(smc->clcsock, level, optname,
+ rc = smc->clcsock->ops->getsockopt(smc->clcsock, level, optname,
optval, optlen);
+ mutex_unlock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
+ return rc;
}
static int smc_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists