[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3525a4cd-1bc7-1008-910b-fb89597cc10a@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 13:25:49 +0100
From: Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/3] net/smc: Resolve the race between link group
access and termination
On 10/01/2022 10:26, Wen Gu wrote:
> We encountered some crashes caused by the race between the access
> and the termination of link groups.
>
<snip>
>
> diff --git a/net/smc/smc.h b/net/smc/smc.h
> index 1a4fc1c..3d0b8e3 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc.h
> +++ b/net/smc/smc.h
> @@ -221,6 +221,7 @@ struct smc_connection {
> */
> u64 peer_token; /* SMC-D token of peer */
> u8 killed : 1; /* abnormal termination */
> + u8 freed : 1; /* normal termiation */
> u8 out_of_sync : 1; /* out of sync with peer */
> };
>
> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.c b/net/smc/smc_core.c
> index cd3c3b8..26a113d 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc_core.c
> +++ b/net/smc/smc_core.c
> @@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ static int smc_lgr_register_conn(struct smc_connection *conn, bool first)
> conn->alert_token_local = 0;
> }
> smc_lgr_add_alert_token(conn);
> + smc_lgr_hold(conn->lgr); /* lgr_put in smc_conn_free() */
> conn->lgr->conns_num++;
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -218,7 +219,6 @@ static void smc_lgr_unregister_conn(struct smc_connection *conn)
> __smc_lgr_unregister_conn(conn);
> }
> write_unlock_bh(&lgr->conns_lock);
> - conn->lgr = NULL;
> }
>
> int smc_nl_get_sys_info(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
> @@ -749,6 +749,7 @@ int smcr_link_init(struct smc_link_group *lgr, struct smc_link *lnk,
> lnk->path_mtu = lnk->smcibdev->pattr[lnk->ibport - 1].active_mtu;
> lnk->link_id = smcr_next_link_id(lgr);
> lnk->lgr = lgr;
> + smc_lgr_hold(lgr); /* lgr_put in smcr_link_clear() */
> lnk->link_idx = link_idx;
> smc_ibdev_cnt_inc(lnk);
> smcr_copy_dev_info_to_link(lnk);
> @@ -841,6 +842,7 @@ static int smc_lgr_create(struct smc_sock *smc, struct smc_init_info *ini)
> lgr->terminating = 0;
> lgr->freeing = 0;
> lgr->vlan_id = ini->vlan_id;
> + refcount_set(&lgr->refcnt, 1); /* set lgr refcnt to 1 */
> mutex_init(&lgr->sndbufs_lock);
> mutex_init(&lgr->rmbs_lock);
> rwlock_init(&lgr->conns_lock);
> @@ -1120,8 +1122,22 @@ void smc_conn_free(struct smc_connection *conn)
> {
> struct smc_link_group *lgr = conn->lgr;
>
> - if (!lgr)
> + if (!lgr || conn->freed)
> + /* The connection has never been registered in a
> + * link group, or has already been freed.
> + *
> + * Check to ensure that the refcnt of link group
> + * won't be put incorrectly.
I would delete the second sentence here, its obvious enough.
> + */
> return;
> +
> + conn->freed = 1;
> + if (!conn->alert_token_local)
> + /* The connection was registered in a link group
> + * defore, but now it is unregistered from it.
'before' ... But would maybe the following be more exact:
'Connection already unregistered from link group.'
We still review the patches...
> + */
> + goto lgr_put;
> +
> if (lgr->is_smcd) {
> if (!list_empty(&lgr->list))
> smc_ism_unset_conn(conn);
> @@ -1138,6 +1154,8 @@ void smc_conn_free(struct smc_connection *conn)
>
> if (!lgr->conns_num)
> smc_lgr_schedule_free_work(lgr);
> +lgr_put:
> + smc_lgr_put(lgr); /* lgr_hold in smc_lgr_register_conn() */
> }
>
> /* unregister a link from a buf_desc */
> @@ -1209,6 +1227,7 @@ void smcr_link_clear(struct smc_link *lnk, bool log)
> smc_ib_destroy_queue_pair(lnk);
> smc_ib_dealloc_protection_domain(lnk);
> smc_wr_free_link_mem(lnk);
> + smc_lgr_put(lnk->lgr); /* lgr_hold in smcr_link_init() */
> smc_ibdev_cnt_dec(lnk);
> put_device(&lnk->smcibdev->ibdev->dev);
> smcibdev = lnk->smcibdev;
> @@ -1283,6 +1302,15 @@ static void smc_lgr_free_bufs(struct smc_link_group *lgr)
> __smc_lgr_free_bufs(lgr, true);
> }
>
> +/* won't be freed until no one accesses to lgr anymore */
> +static void __smc_lgr_free(struct smc_link_group *lgr)
> +{
> + smc_lgr_free_bufs(lgr);
> + if (!lgr->is_smcd)
> + smc_wr_free_lgr_mem(lgr);
> + kfree(lgr);
> +}
> +
> /* remove a link group */
> static void smc_lgr_free(struct smc_link_group *lgr)
> {
> @@ -1298,7 +1326,6 @@ static void smc_lgr_free(struct smc_link_group *lgr)
> smc_llc_lgr_clear(lgr);
> }
>
> - smc_lgr_free_bufs(lgr);
> destroy_workqueue(lgr->tx_wq);
> if (lgr->is_smcd) {
> smc_ism_put_vlan(lgr->smcd, lgr->vlan_id);
> @@ -1306,11 +1333,21 @@ static void smc_lgr_free(struct smc_link_group *lgr)
> if (!atomic_dec_return(&lgr->smcd->lgr_cnt))
> wake_up(&lgr->smcd->lgrs_deleted);
> } else {
> - smc_wr_free_lgr_mem(lgr);
> if (!atomic_dec_return(&lgr_cnt))
> wake_up(&lgrs_deleted);
> }
> - kfree(lgr);
> + smc_lgr_put(lgr); /* theoretically last lgr_put */
> +}
> +
> +void smc_lgr_hold(struct smc_link_group *lgr)
> +{
> + refcount_inc(&lgr->refcnt);
> +}
> +
> +void smc_lgr_put(struct smc_link_group *lgr)
> +{
> + if (refcount_dec_and_test(&lgr->refcnt))
> + __smc_lgr_free(lgr);
> }
>
> static void smc_sk_wake_ups(struct smc_sock *smc)
> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.h b/net/smc/smc_core.h
> index 73d0c35..edbd401 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc_core.h
> +++ b/net/smc/smc_core.h
> @@ -249,6 +249,7 @@ struct smc_link_group {
> u8 terminating : 1;/* lgr is terminating */
> u8 freeing : 1; /* lgr is being freed */
>
> + refcount_t refcnt; /* lgr reference count */
> bool is_smcd; /* SMC-R or SMC-D */
> u8 smc_version;
> u8 negotiated_eid[SMC_MAX_EID_LEN];
> @@ -470,6 +471,8 @@ static inline void smc_set_pci_values(struct pci_dev *pci_dev,
>
> void smc_lgr_cleanup_early(struct smc_link_group *lgr);
> void smc_lgr_terminate_sched(struct smc_link_group *lgr);
> +void smc_lgr_hold(struct smc_link_group *lgr);
> +void smc_lgr_put(struct smc_link_group *lgr);
> void smcr_port_add(struct smc_ib_device *smcibdev, u8 ibport);
> void smcr_port_err(struct smc_ib_device *smcibdev, u8 ibport);
> void smc_smcd_terminate(struct smcd_dev *dev, u64 peer_gid,
--
Karsten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists