lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5411b3a0-7e36-fa75-5c5c-eb2fda9273b1@amd.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Jan 2022 11:10:52 -0600
From:   "Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@....com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
        Aaron Ma <aaron.ma@...onical.com>, henning.schild@...mens.com,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, hayeswang@...ltek.com, tiwai@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v3] net: usb: r8152: Check used MAC passthrough
 address

On 1/11/2022 11:06, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 10:54:50 -0600 Limonciello, Mario wrote:
>>> Also knowing how those OSes handle the new docks which don't have
>>> unique device IDs would obviously be great..
>>
>> I'm sorry, can you give me some more context on this?  What unique
>> device IDs?
> 
> We used to match the NICs based on their device ID. The USB NICs
> present in docks had lenovo as manufacturer and a unique device ID.
> Now reportedly the new docks are using generic realtek IDs so we have
> no way to differentiate "blessed" dock NICs from random USB dongles,
> and inheriting the address to all devices with the generic relatek IDs
> breaks setups with multiple dongles, e.g. Henning's setup. >
> If we know of a fuse that can be read on new docks that'd put us back
> in more comfortable position. If we need to execute random heuristics
> to find the "right NIC" we'd much rather have udev or NetworkManager
> or some other user space do that according to whatever policy it
> chooses.

I agree - this stuff in the kernel isn't supposed to be applying to 
anything other than the OEM dongles or docks.  If you can't identify 
them they shouldn't be in here.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ