netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] fprobe: Introduce fprobe function entry/exit probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220111223944.jbi3mxedwifxwyz5@ast-mbp.lan>
Date:   Tue, 11 Jan 2022 14:39:44 -0800
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        "Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] fprobe: Introduce fprobe function entry/exit
 probe

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 12:00:17AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
> 
> Here is a short series of patches, which shows what I replied
> to your series.
> 
> This introduces the fprobe, the function entry/exit probe with
> multiple probe point support. This also introduces the rethook
> for hooking function return, which I cloned from kretprobe.
> 
> I also rewrite your [08/13] bpf patch to use this fprobe instead
> of kprobes. I didn't tested that one, but the sample module seems
> to work. Please test bpf part with your libbpf updates.
> 
> BTW, while implementing the fprobe, I introduced the per-probe
> point private data, but I'm not sure why you need it. It seems
> that data is not used from bpf...
> 
> If this is good for you, I would like to proceed this with
> the rethook and rewrite the kretprobe to use the rethook to
> hook the functions. That should be much cleaner (and easy to
> prepare for the fgraph tracer integration)

What is the speed of attach/detach of thousands fprobes?