[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f7bd672f-dfa8-93fa-e101-e57b90faeb1e@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 12:40:10 +0100
From: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: Phyr Starter
Hi
Am 10.01.22 um 20:34 schrieb Matthew Wilcox:
> TLDR: I want to introduce a new data type:
>
> struct phyr {
> phys_addr_t addr;
> size_t len;
> };
Did you look at struct dma_buf_map? [1]
For graphics framebuffers, we have the problem that these buffers can be
in I/O or system memory (and possibly move between them). Linux'
traditional interfaces (memcpy_toio(), etc) don't deal with the
differences well.
So we added struct dma_buf_map as an abstraction to the buffer address.
There are interfaces for accessing and copying the data. I also have a
patchset somewhere that adds caching information to the structure.
struct dma_buf_map is for graphics, but really just another memory API.
When we introduced struct dma_buf_map we thought of additional use
cases, but couldn't really find any at the time. Maybe what you're
describing is that use case and struct dma_buf_map could be extended for
this purpose.
Best regards
Thomas
[1]
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.16/source/include/linux/dma-buf-map.h#L115
>
> and use it to replace bio_vec as well as using it to replace the array
> of struct pages used by get_user_pages() and friends.
>
> ---
>
> There are two distinct problems I want to address: doing I/O to memory
> which does not have a struct page and efficiently doing I/O to large
> blobs of physically contiguous memory, regardless of whether it has a
> struct page. There are some other improvements which I regard as minor.
>
> There are many types of memory that one might want to do I/O to that do
> not have a struct page, some examples:
> - Memory on a graphics card (or other PCI card, but gfx seems to be
> the primary provider of DRAM on the PCI bus today)
> - DAX, or other pmem (there are some fake pages today, but this is
> mostly a workaround for the IO problem today)
> - Guest memory being accessed from the hypervisor (KVM needs to
> create structpages to make this happen. Xen doesn't ...)
> All of these kinds of memories can be addressed by the CPU and so also
> by a bus master. That is, there is a physical address that the CPU
> can use which will address this memory, and there is a way to convert
> that to a DMA address which can be programmed into another device.
> There's no intent here to support memory which can be accessed by a
> complex scheme like writing an address to a control register and then
> accessing the memory through a FIFO; this is for memory which can be
> accessed by DMA and CPU loads and stores.
>
> For get_user_pages() and friends, we currently fill an array of struct
> pages, each one representing PAGE_SIZE bytes. For an application that
> is using 1GB hugepages, writing 2^18 entries is a significant overhead.
> It also makes drivers hard to write as they have to recoalesce the
> struct pages, even though the VM can tell it whether those 2^18 pages
> are contiguous.
>
> On the minor side, struct phyr can represent any mappable chunk of memory.
> A bio_vec is limited to 2^32 bytes, while on 64-bit machines a phyr
> can represent larger than 4GB. A phyr is the same size as a bio_vec
> on 64 bit (16 bytes), and the same size for 32-bit with PAE (12 bytes).
> It is smaller for 32-bit machines without PAE (8 bytes instead of 12).
>
> Finally, it may be possible to stop using scatterlist to describe the
> input to the DMA-mapping operation. We may be able to get struct
> scatterlist down to just dma_address and dma_length, with chaining
> handled through an enclosing struct.
>
> I would like to see phyr replace bio_vec everywhere it's currently used.
> I don't have time to do that work now because I'm busy with folios.
> If someone else wants to take that on, I shall cheer from the sidelines.
> What I do intend to do is:
>
> - Add an interface to gup.c to pin/unpin N phyrs
> - Add a sg_map_phyrs()
> This will take an array of phyrs and allocate an sg for them
> - Whatever else I need to do to make one RDMA driver happy with
> this scheme
>
> At that point, I intend to stop and let others more familiar with this
> area of the kernel continue the conversion of drivers.
>
> P.S. If you've had the Prodigy song running through your head the whole
> time you've been reading this email ... I'm sorry / You're welcome.
> If people insist, we can rename this to phys_range or something boring,
> but I quite like the spelling of phyr with the pronunciation of "fire".
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev
Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature" of type "application/pgp-signature" (841 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists