lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 12 Jan 2022 10:13:53 +0800
From:   Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@...il.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, jreuter@...na.de,
        ralf@...ux-mips.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-hams@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ax25: use after free in ax25_connect

I try to use ax25_release to trigger this bug like this:
ax25_release                 ax25_connect
lock_sock(sk);
-----------------------------sk = sock->sk;
-----------------------------ax25 = sk_to_ax25(sk);
ax25_destroy_socket(ax25);
release_sock(sk);
-----------------------------lock_sock(sk);
-----------------------------use ax25 again

But i failed beacause their have large speed difference. And i
don't have a physical device to test other function in ax25.
Anyway, i still think there will have a function to trigger this
race condition like ax25_destroy_timer. Beacause Any ohter
functions in ax25_proto_ops like ax25_bind protect ax25_sock by 
lock_sock(sk).

Thanks.




On 2022/1/12 上午4:56, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 
> On 1/10/22 20:20, Hangyu Hua wrote:
>> sk_to_ax25(sk) needs to be called after lock_sock(sk) to avoid UAF
>> caused by a race condition.
> 
> Can you describe what race condition you have found exactly ?
> 
> sk pointer can not change.
> 
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@...il.com>
>> ---
>>   net/ax25/af_ax25.c | 4 +++-
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c
>> index cfca99e295b8..c5d62420a2a8 100644
>> --- a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c
>> +++ b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c
>> @@ -1127,7 +1127,7 @@ static int __must_check ax25_connect(struct 
>> socket *sock,
>>       struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len, int flags)
>>   {
>>       struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
>> -    ax25_cb *ax25 = sk_to_ax25(sk), *ax25t;
>> +    ax25_cb *ax25, *ax25t;
>>       struct full_sockaddr_ax25 *fsa = (struct full_sockaddr_ax25 
>> *)uaddr;
>>       ax25_digi *digi = NULL;
>>       int ct = 0, err = 0;
>> @@ -1155,6 +1155,8 @@ static int __must_check ax25_connect(struct 
>> socket *sock,
>>       lock_sock(sk);
>> +    ax25 = sk_to_ax25(sk);
>> +
>>       /* deal with restarts */
>>       if (sock->state == SS_CONNECTING) {
>>           switch (sk->sk_state) {

Powered by blists - more mailing lists