[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9rxdksVZkN4DF_GabsEPrSDrKbo1cVQs77B_s-e2jZ64A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 14:18:34 +0100
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
WireGuard mailing list <wireguard@...ts.zx2c4.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH crypto v3 0/2] reduce code size from blake2s on m68k and
other small platforms
Hi Geert,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 12:00 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Thanks for the series!
>
> On m68k:
> add/remove: 1/4 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 4/-4232 (-4228)
> Function old new delta
> __ksymtab_blake2s256_hmac 12 - -12
> blake2s_init.constprop 94 - -94
> blake2s256_hmac 302 - -302
> sha1_transform 4402 582 -3820
> Total: Before=4230537, After=4226309, chg -0.10%
>
> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Excellent, thanks for the breakdown. So this shaves off ~4k, which was
about what we were shooting for here, so I think indeed this series
accomplishes its goal of counteracting the addition of BLAKE2s.
Hopefully Herbert will apply this series for 5.17.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists