[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9qGs8yfYy0GVcV8XaUt9cjCqQF2D79RvrsQE+CNLCeojA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 19:50:58 +0100
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
WireGuard mailing list <wireguard@...ts.zx2c4.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH crypto 1/2] lib/crypto: blake2s-generic: reduce code size
on small systems
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 7:32 PM Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org> wrote:
> How about unrolling the inner loop but not the outer one? Wouldn't that give
> most of the benefit, without hurting performance as much?
>
> If you stay with this approach and don't unroll either loop, can you use 'r' and
> 'i' instead of 'i' and 'j', to match the naming in G()?
All this might work, sure. But as mentioned earlier, I've abandoned
this entirely, as I don't think this patch is necessary. See the v3
patchset instead:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20220111220506.742067-1-Jason@zx2c4.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists