[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3520c1e1609d8bef103766ad03508d0060824b98.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 12:15:01 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] ipv6: hand dst refs to cork setup
On Tue, 2022-01-11 at 20:39 +0000, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 1/11/22 17:11, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > On Tue, 2022-01-11 at 01:21 +0000, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> > > During cork->dst setup, ip6_make_skb() gets an additional reference to
> > > a passed in dst. However, udpv6_sendmsg() doesn't need dst after calling
> > > ip6_make_skb(), and so we can save two additional atomics by passing
> > > dst references to ip6_make_skb(). udpv6_sendmsg() is the only caller, so
> > > it's enough to make sure it doesn't use dst afterwards.
> >
> > What about the corked path in udp6_sendmsg()? I mean:
>
> It doesn't change it for callers, so the ref stays with udp6_sendmsg() when
> corking. To compensate for ip6_setup_cork() there is an explicit dst_hold()
> in ip6_append_data, should be fine.
Whoops, I underlooked that chunk, thanks for pointing it out!
Yes, it looks fine.
> @@ -1784,6 +1784,7 @@ int ip6_append_data(struct sock *sk,
> /*
> * setup for corking
> */
> + dst_hold(&rt->dst);
> err = ip6_setup_cork(sk, &inet->cork, &np->cork,
> ipc6, rt);
>
>
> I don't care much about corking perf, but might be better to implement
> this "handing away" for ip6_append_data() as well to be more consistent
> with ip6_make_skb().
I'm personally fine with the the added dst_hold() in ip6_append_data()
Thanks!
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists