lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 17:33:05 +0100 From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com> To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/3] bpf: move from sha1 to blake2s in tag calculation On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 5:20 PM Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 6:20 AM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com> wrote: > > > > BLAKE2s is faster and more secure. SHA-1 has been broken for a long time > > now. This also removes quite a bit of code, and lets us potentially > > remove sha1 from lib, which would further reduce vmlinux size. > > Same NACK as before. > Stop this spam. Pls. You can read the 0/3 for an explanation of why I sent this v2. I reject your characterization of this as "spam". Thanks, Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists